Becerra, et al., which recently survived its third motion to dismiss.Section 32310 states(a) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, any person in this state who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170. Firearms Policy Coalition, along with Firearms Policy Foundation, Second Amendment Foundation, The Calguns Foundation, and several individuals had filed the first suit Wiese v. Live cam of California shooting ranges, May 30th, 2019. Duncan is the second case that was filed challenging California’s ban on “large-capacity” magazines. Let’s cut to the chase: when Judge Benitez issued his ruling, California Penal Code section 32310, better known as the 10-round magazine ban, was declared unconstitutional, and the State of California was prohibited from enforcing the law. On Friday, Judge Benitez of the United States District Court in the Southern District of California granted a motion for summary judgment in, declared that California Penal Code § 32310 was unconstitutional and enjoined the state from enforcing it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |